Yea, the Baathists were socialists who preach Arab unity. No one has seemed to notice that any party based on political and nationalists beliefs, like the Baaths, were outlawed in Iraq, and replaced with ethnic and religious based parties.
There are kurdish terrorists, which America supports, fighting both Turkey and Iran. They think they can use the Kurds as a lever to destabilize Iraq, Turkey, and Iran, and start the process which will break up all the Muslim countries in the area, including Jordan and Egypt.
You can't understand the Iraqi war without understanding that it was supposed to be a disaster. Iraq was always intended to become an ethnic war.
Which is why the oil companies wanted nothing to do with the neocons and their plans. No corporation likes instability in their backyard.
Here's the paper cited in (2).
The Arab Moslem world, therefore, is not the major strategic problem which we shall face in the Eighties, despite the fact that it carries the main threat against Israel, due to its growing military might. This world, with its ethnic minorities, its factions and internal crises, which is astonishingly self-destructive, as we can see in Lebanon, in non-Arab Iran and now also in Syria, is unable to deal successfully with its fundamental problems and does not therefore constitute a real threat against the State of Israel in the long run, but only in the short run where its immediate military power has great import. In the long run, this world will be unable to exist within its present framework in the areas around us without having to go through genuine revolutionary changes. The Moslem Arab World is built like a temporary house of cards put together by foreigners (France and Britain in the Nineteen Twenties), without the wishes and desires of the inhabitants having been taken into account. It was arbitrarily divided into 19 states, all made of combinations of minorites and ethnic groups which are hostile to one another, so that every Arab Moslem state nowadays faces ethnic social destruction from within, and in some a civil war is already raging.5 Most of the Arabs, 118 million out of 170 million, live in Africa, mostly in Egypt (45 million today).
International Jewry has been creating instability everywhere they can for 2000 years.
international Jewry is conducting tribal warfare against EVERYONE EVERYWHERE AT ALL TIMES.
Americans are immature and poorly educated as a group that is largely the immigrant first of Europe and then elsewhere. They have never known what is going on in the world. They are educated to be good little workers that slobber to Pavlov's bells and do not think too hard about anything.
Because of this, Americans think they are the Jews/Israels friends - but the JEWS HAVE NO FRIENDS EXCEPT JEWS and just take a look at what they have done to any foolish or kind people that harbor them or try to deal with them in history.
Posted 3/14/2010 7:37 pm
The United States is a perfect example. To reward us for helping crush Hitler the jews desegregated the country leading to the rape and murder of hundreds of thousands of whites.
Posted 2/16/2012 11:59 am
Taking Apart Iraq's Nuclear Threat
By Ehud Barak
Published: September 04, 2002
SIGN IN TO E-MAIL
PRINT
SINGLE-PAGE
President Bush's policy of ousting Saddam Hussein creates an extraordinary standard of strategic and moral clarity. Millions in the Middle East, including many Iraqis, are praying that the in-depth, genuine -- and so typically American -- public debate that is developing before our eyes about Iraq will not dilute this clarity.
On a practical level, the whole debate can be reduced to three questions: whether a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for an inspection regime of the greatest rigor is needed now; whether unilateral or multilateral action against Saddam Hussein would need to honor the timetable of such a resolution; and whether the resolution's wording or timetable would provide Mr. Hussein with the means to postpone or cancel a future attack against him.
These were people I knew well, but I wasn't aware of jews at all. If someone didn't wear a yarmulke and follow the kosher rules I didn't look for any sign of jewishness. Most of them were self described atheists. But the war flushed them out. It was impossible for a libertarian to support the invasion, but the jews did, and they flocked to the neocon magazines and radio shows to get their talking points. Meanwhile gentile conservatives were leaving the Republican party in disgust and refusing to vote for McCain, the jew's second choice after Jewliani.
Taking Apart Iraq's Nuclear Threat
By Ehud Barak
Published: September 04, 2002
SIGN IN TO E-MAIL
PRINT
SINGLE-PAGE
President Bush's policy of ousting Saddam Hussein creates an extraordinary standard of strategic and moral clarity. Millions in the Middle East, including many Iraqis, are praying that the in-depth, genuine -- and so typically American -- public debate that is developing before our eyes about Iraq will not dilute this clarity.
On a practical level, the whole debate can be reduced to three questions: whether a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for an inspection regime of the greatest rigor is needed now; whether unilateral or multilateral action against Saddam Hussein would need to honor the timetable of such a resolution; and whether the resolution's wording or timetable would provide Mr. Hussein with the means to postpone or cancel a future attack against him.
Sound familiar?
Yeah, it does. It's been playing on the nightly news this week with Iran in place of the word Iraq.
Pretty disgusting. And all the little lemmings just go along to get along because it's too scary to stand up against Jews.